Yamaha QL5 > Dante via ethernet > ethernet to USB 3. Would that me the consoles fault, or the DAWs fault? I test-drived both DAWs yesterday using a different console, and noticed that Waves Tracks required a higher buffer rate than Reaper for the audio to record clean. PureMix A membership will get you access to multitracks from past and current mixing contests (currently 10+ multitracks), as well as multitracks from some of Fab’s tutorial videos. I also notice that Reaper seems to use less CPU and memory than Waves Tracks which seems weird to me because Tracks is a simpler program. 20+ premium multitracks that you can purchase and download a la carte. With Reaper, I like that I can have a redundant secondary recording path, in case a hard drive fails, etc. And I really like that it has a system lock feature to prevent you from accidentally stopping the recording.
My primary need is to have a reliable clean recording!!!įrom my experience so far, I like that Waves Tracks is fairly straight forward. Not mixing! I will give the tracks to the band and they'll give it to their studio guy. Please keep in mind that I will be using the DAW strictly for recording. I was wondering if you guys have a preference between Reaper and Waves Tracks. I typically use Reaper for my recording needs, however, I've been looking into Waves Tracks, as I hear that a lot of FOH guys are using it for simple recording and playback for virtual sound check. I have a gig in couple weeks where I am mixing front of house as well as multi-track recording up to 32 channels out of the console.
0 kommentar(er)
